Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

A QB Controversy In Blacksburg?

Could this be avoided with Mark Leal in the game?


All it took was one loss for the fanbase to work themselves into a tizzy.  The North End Zone was one of the most critical, obnoxious and depressing group of students I've ever sat with.  I would be a hypocrite if I didn't take some blame myself for my (re)actions in regards to some moments in the game.  I've never booed a Virginia Tech player before in my life and yet, amongst the rain of boo's I found my own after the 11-yard punt by Scott Demler.  It was a sobering moment for me.

Most interesting to me are the criticisms of first year starting QB, Logan Thomas.  Before, during and especially after the loss to Clemson, I heard a lot of negative comments regarding Logan Thomas.  The strongest comments that I heard involved Logan Thomas being compared to Sean Glennon, maybe the most infamous QB in Virginia Tech history.  And now we find Virginia Tech 4-1 on the season, and there are clamors in the stands for Mark Leal in place of Thomas. 

Below the jump, we will explore the possibility of a quarterback controversy in Blacksburg.

Star-divide

Ask any of the coaches and they will tell you that there is less than a zero percent chance of a QB controversy.  Ask some of the fans watching the games and they will tell you differently.  Mark Leal is quickly becoming a more common name in Blacksburg.  Warranted or not, Logan Thomas is garnering comparisons to Sean Glennon and Mark Leal is getting compared to Tyrod Taylor

There have been three claims that I have heard about Logan Thomas and Mark Leal and we will examine all three. 

Claim 1: Logan Thomas Isn't A Strong Enough Leader

This is a claim that I hear a lot, more so after the Hokies' first loss of the season to Clemson.  One particular comment made after the Clemson game doesn't help his cause.

When asked about how to fix the passing game, Thomas responded "I have no idea." 

This isn't what you want or need your starting quarterback to say.  Thomas needs to come across as more confident and positive, even after his first loss as a starter. 

While this doesn't look good for Thomas, you have to take into account what some of the coaches have been saying about him.  Thomas has a quiet leadership quality to him.  Some in the locker room have compared his quiet confidence to the same swagger that Tyrod Taylor carried around all the time. 

Time will tell if Logan will get more confident or assertive.  What this argument doesn't answer is whether or not Mark Leal would be any better as a leader.  Therefore, this argument really holds no weight.  It proves nothing either way, therefore people, stop talking about it.

Claim 2: Mark Leal Fits Virginia Tech's System Better

This is another claim that I have been hearing since the spring scrimmages.  Logan Thomas is tall and rigid when moving about in the pocket while Mark Leal is shorter and agile when scrambling.  It's easy to see why the comparisons to Tyrod Taylor are being thrown out. 

People don't like change and a lot of people aren't used to seeing a tall, poised quarterback in the pocket.  Logan Thomas isn't looking to run around in the backfield, he's looking to sit in there and throw bullets. 

Claims that our offensive line isn't good enough to support a pocket passing quarterback are the keys to this argument.  If the offensive line isn't good enough to protect him in the pocket, we need somebody who can quickly escape pressure and move outside of the pocket.

This argument has some legitimacy, but it also has its flaws.  While it is true that Logan isn't the most nimble player out there, having a mobile QB won't solve the offensive line problems.  Ask any offensive lineman, it's a pain to have a scrambling QB in the backfield. 

When an offensive lineman is engaged with his defender he has to keep his eyes on his target.  It makes his job easier if he assumes his QB is directly behind him.  With a scrambling QB, the lineman's assumptions can go out the window.  It is very easy for the lineman to lose track of the QB and that's how assignments get blown on longer plays.  This can directly lead to botched plays or sacks.

At the same time, if you can't escape pressure, you're going to get hit.  Leal could definitely avoid pressure better than Logan Thomas could.  Leal is lighter on his feet and more nimble than Thomas.  With this skill set comes the ability to break off some long runs with your feet.  Logan can very effectively pick up one or two yards by falling forward but the likelihood that he will bust off a huge run is doubtful.  Leal brings that extra dynamic, but even those long 70-yard Tyrod-esque runs aren't a guarantee by any stretch.

With O'Cain calling the plays now, it's unclear if the new spread, shotgun formations are a part of his natural system or a result of Logan Thomas being the QB running the system.  Either way, both of these QB's bring different skill sets to the table. 

Feel free to debate this one.

Claim 3: Logan Thomas Isn't Built To Be A Quarterback

Of all of the claims this one might hold the most weight.  Logan Thomas was recruited as a tight-end to Virginia Tech.  Thomas has always dreamed of playing receiver/tight-end and this is on record.  It is also on record that Thomas would not have chosen Virginia Tech had they recruited him as a QB out of the gate. 

Thomas' height and natural skills as a receiver would certainly give validity to the argument that he needs to play the position that is most natural to him.  We saw against Wake Forest in 2010 that he can make the big plays as a receiver.

Mark Leal was recruited as a QB and played QB all the way through high school.  It's what he's known and is comfortable with. 

It's very easy to make the argument that both players should do what is natural to them.  Let Leal be the quarterback and let Logan Thomas fill some gaps in the very weak tight-end position for the Hokies. 

The flaw in this argument is that this argument goes off the assumption that Logan Thomas won't improve.  Thomas is a first year starting QB and is going to go through some growing pains.  It's impossible to tell how Logan will look two to three years down the road, or maybe as soon as by the end of the season. 

It says a lot about the confidence that the fans have in Thomas after wanting to make the switch after a five game tenure. 

I believe this is an argument that can be debated as well.

The Verdict

The reality of the situation is that there isn't a QB controversy within the locker room.  The coaches speak highly of Thomas and his fellow players are doing the same.  If coaches listened to the fans, Tim Tebow would be leading the 0-4 Broncos for the entirety of the season. 

Should Thomas continue to perform poorly though, it could become interesting to see if the coaches give Leal some special packages in the offense.  In the mean time, be calm and carry on.

What is your take on the debate?  Post in the comments below.

Poll
Who Should Be The Starting QB For Virginia Tech?
Logan Thomas
359 votes
Mark Leal
233 votes
Dual-QB System
147 votes

739 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Here's the deal

Logan Thomas is and should be the man until the coaches say he isn’t. HOWEVER, I would still like to see more of Mark Leal in situations where the game is not in doubt… either way.

For example, I think Leal should have had all the 4th quarter reps that occurred after Clemson hung their third touchdown on us. It’s clear that Thomas was not going to win the game by that point. Why not let Leal get some experience and let the coaches have another look at him in a gametime situation?

If the staff all say LT is the man as an article of faith, well, I think that leads to trouble. However, if they can compare the two in the same game more often they might be able to say it convincingly based on the evidence.

by RHG on Oct 3, 2011 3:27 AM EDT reply actions  

4th quarter Leal...

Well, if LT’s quote after the game was a confused and rattled, “I have no idea” (on how to fix …)

How much extra damage would his confidence have taken had he been pulled in the first ugly game he’s had while running the show?

by VT1996 on Oct 3, 2011 7:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Claim #3

May be the most convincing argument for a QB switch.

While Thomas throws a beautiful spiral with undeniable zip, he certainly isn’t the most accurate passer nor does he have great touch on the ball.

I’m not saying that Thomas can’t play QB, but I DO believe that the coaching staff needs to take a good hard look at his performances, why he was recruited initially, what he has stated regarding his position of choice, & move forward from there. More time under center may improve his play, but I’m feeling very uncertain & have to wonder if there is really much upside to staying with him at QB. I think that you also have to ask if this move to QB is best for his possible future in football. Also, no knock on Draeger, but we could use the help at TE.

FWIW, not a fan of the dual QB idea. That’s a position where I believe you need stability.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!

Robert Hunter

by Buck Melanoma on Oct 3, 2011 5:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I just don't know, man...

I saw the dreaded Sean Glennon comparison, but hell, Glennon at least had some touch on his throw.

I’m not a football coach, and obviously, the staff sees something with Thomas. But to my untrained eyes, I do not see any improvement that could translate into a 10-win season this year. If Sat was any indication of the year to come, I see “L’s” coming v Miami, v UNC, v GT, and possibly, v Wake Forest.

To me, the question is…Is the payoff for Thomas being the QB worth the investment of tossing this season down the drain?

by Leonard Thompson on Oct 3, 2011 9:09 AM EDT reply actions  

10 win season?

Forget that right now..

There are only 8 games left – 7 regular season + 1 bowl game (forget ACCCG)

10 win season means 6-2 the rest of the way. Between games vs Miami, GT, UNC, a bowl team… heck.. throw in a fired up UVA team on the road. No way do we go 6-2 the rest of the way.

by VT1996 on Oct 3, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

you're kidding, right?

We have one bad game, and you want to throw in the towel? I thought Hokie fans were better than this… I’m not saying another 10-win season is assured by any stretch, but c’mon, let’s get real, here. Teams do better than you would have thought through the first few weeks ALL THE TIME. I expect a big bounce back win next week, and then we’ll take it from there and we’ll see.

by hokiegrad on Oct 3, 2011 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

“No way do we go 6-2 the rest of the way.”

How many examples do you need of Frank Beamer teams bouncing back from a tough loss or two?

"Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time I do what I have to."

by bluecollarhokie on Oct 3, 2011 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about last year?

jeebus, what a bunch of friggin’ crybabies.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!

Robert Hunter

by Buck Melanoma on Oct 4, 2011 5:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

thank you Buck

friggin crybabies, couldnt have said it better myself

"Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time I do what I have to."

by bluecollarhokie on Oct 4, 2011 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coaching

I think the issue is play calling verses a qb controversy. When VT had to pass, the pressure was coming from the offensive left side, so why didn’t the coaches call plays to allow Thomas to roll away from the pressure. A screen to that side may have even slowed the pass rush down. Even earlier in the game, VT took few shots down field to open the running lanes up for Wilson. If the play calling doesn’t become a bit more imaginative, VT could be in for a long season.

by dkeffer on Oct 3, 2011 9:14 AM EDT reply actions  

My Ramblings

Okay, Logan Thomas isn’t as bad as Sean Glennon. He has been fairly good so far this season but he needs to get better in a hurry or those comparisons will keep raining down. Sean Glennon would just sit back in the pocket and take the Glennon Statue Sack instead of throwing the ball away. Logan is definitely a more competent QB than that and I will never compare him to Glennon. I do think that people’s expectations (including mine) are a little high of Logan. You have to remember how all the people at ESPN were comparing Thomas to Cam Newton. Was it an unfair comparison? Yes. Should Hokies fans expect anything less than winning every game? I don’t think that’s not reasonable. However, I will say that LT3 looked like he took a few steps back in this game. Some of his passes were very questionable and Stinespring even said: “Early on I think he didn’t feel comfortable throwing the balls he threw, but then he threw some real nice passes out there.” (Hokiehaven.com article). The guy is still going through some growing pains, which are expected, and I don’t know if Leal would do any better. I don’t think it would hurt to try it out though. I’m not saying a dual QB situation like Glennon-Tyrod, but at least give Leal some reps. We all have to remember that Tyrod wasn’t that great in his first few starts either. Tyrod didn’t turn the corner until his Junior year and while I hope that’s not the case with LT3, it is a possibility. I’m not giving up on LT3 yet because these things take time. I’m not so sure about everyone else though.

by Chris Brooks on Oct 3, 2011 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

I wonder what LT is thinking?

You got to pull LT and make him a TE to give him a out if things start to get bad. Right now I bet LT is thinking shit I got to think about the future and save any NFL hopes now by becoming an TE again. The big question is LT willing to work to become a QB? For me I think it will be NFL suicide if he does.

by HokieRob on Oct 3, 2011 11:03 AM EDT reply actions  

please...

are we really having this conversation 5 weeks into this guy’s career? That’s just not fair. Talk about whether Leal should get into the game, sure (although I suspect he doesn’t have an equivalent grasp of the playbook, he’s even less experienced, etc. so temper your expectations there). But give LT some time to grow here. He’s got two more years of eligibility after this year. Let’s see how the rest of this year goes, please, before we pronounce judgement and declare it NFL suicide for him to stay at QB. I don’t think Newton was so hot during his time at Florida. By the time he got to AU he was more experienced, more mature, etc. Give LT a chance.

by hokiegrad on Oct 3, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

What did I start?

Thomas is our quarterback. The problem is the play-calling. I think there is a possibility of Thomas being unseated next year, but that’s NEXT year. Still, I think it’s way too early to start thinking about this. A few more bad performances and we can begin to have this discussion.

by chicagomaroon on Oct 3, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Thomas would be just fine in the spread option. He is a tight end with an arm and his game must be legs, legs, legs then some arm, mostly off play action


Tomahawk Nation Nole-Holds-Barred Analysis of FSU Sports!

by Bud Elliott on Oct 3, 2011 3:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, stick with LT

Like I said in an earlier post…I love Frank Beamer. Great Man, does it the right way. But we have learned that he has now become a Cheer-Leader, a Motivator…which is OK by me BUT is he Joe Pa in waiting? Hope not but maybe headed that way…….we need coaching. You can see it on the field that this team is in dire need of leadership from the sidelines…An offensive Mind & innovator! Every team at some point needs to re-invent its self…football is an ever evolving sport…Now is the time. As for the criticism of Logan Thomas. He has the talent, we as fans just have to wait for him to develop. This loss is squarely on the coaches. (Stiney, Cain & Beamer Sr.) If they respond maybe the players will. I don’t think the Cheer-Leader speech will work on this team (Without Tyrod’s Leadership) they need to help LT, it is not like last year when Tyrod helped the coaches look good…it’s there tern to take the blame! Mark Leal would certainly do a good job if put into the game but in the long haul LT has THE major up-side but we may need a legit offensive coordinator to help him. Clemson went out and found one why can’t we?

by LJCool on Oct 3, 2011 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

LT3 Will be fine

He just needs more time and experience. how about supporting him instead of calling for his job. I know we have become used to winning 10 games a season as that and the ACC championship are the only things to brag about. If you want to blame someone blame Beamer for not doing something about the offensive coaching staff. We all know Tyrod made Stiney look good last year. The coaches had all spring and summer to help LT work on his mechanics. if they were so headstrong on making him a quarterback they should have done a better job. I’m sure they knew his passes constantly have been high. I put all the blame on Beamer and his inability to bring in an offensive staff that was worth something. I say this as a Beamer supporter, but maybe this is the kind of season we need in order for Beamer to finally do what needs to be done.

by Bradley Booker on Oct 3, 2011 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Fans have zero perspective sometimes

Glennon the most “infamous” qb in VT history? Really? Wanna think about that one for a second?

Knee jerk reactions are rarely good decisions. We lost a game!!!! Flibbity Flobbity Floo!! Fire everybody!!! Jerk that qb’s scholly!!! LT is young, he will learn.

Take a look at TT’s numbers in 08 and Randall’s in 02, hell back in 06 everybody wanted Ike in there. That would have been interesting. Give Logan time, he’s gonna lose a few games but every game is a learning experience.

I’ve come to the conclusion that some are fans of the Virginia Tech Hokies while others are just fans of winning.

We got 7 games left in the regular season, time to focus and execute cause if we play like we did on Saturday the Canes are gonna eat us alive. What the team doesnt need is boos and calls for heads. It needs our support.

Go Hokies
Beat the Canes

"Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time I do what I have to."

by bluecollarhokie on Oct 3, 2011 6:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

Hokies have lost 1 game this year, granted they have looked unimpressive some of their wins. Give LT the rest of the year to progress he doesn’t need to be looking over his shoulder every snap that isn’t going to help him make his reads. I trust the coaching staff will make the correct decision about Logan’s and Mark’s future and what is best for the team.

by sevendeadlies on Oct 7, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Offense problems

Begin and end with Stinespring. I am sick of blaming the players! Good coaches make things happen with good talent. We have great talent and a good OC. We need to replace Stinespring and copy Clemson and hire a dynamic coach. Look at history. Tech equals great defense and terrible offense. Reason? Foster has to reload with freshmen-tech’s defense still reaches the top 15. Last year was an anomaly. Stinespring gets more talent on offense than we have had in 20 years and we end up in the bottom half of the rankings. Beamer needs to stay loyal or fill that empty trophy case. He can’t do both.

by Walter Lee Willard on Oct 3, 2011 11:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Stinespring

should have been drawn, quartered, & placed on display on the drill field long ago as a warning to future VT coordinators.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!

Robert Hunter

by Buck Melanoma on Oct 4, 2011 5:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Recent formula

Beamer is trying to use the current Alabama strategy of having a great defense, special teams, and just enough offense to not only win games but national championships. Problem is, is we haven’t recruited like bama, we keep the same mediocre position coaches (Curt Newsome) and we keep trying to get lucky with walk on kickers and punters. So, we need imo to go and get one of those snazzy OC’s to put our athletes to good use!

by jhes160 on Oct 4, 2011 12:20 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

4 years coming

This qb “hole” has been coming for 4 years. Just think what it would be like now if we’d gritted it out with Glennon and left the red shirt on Tyrod that first year. He’d be here now, paired with a mature receiver corps. Imagine the possibilities. But honest.y, think back to what Tyrod was really like that first year. His passing was very uneven — combination of him being new AND the receivers being largely inexperienced. He spooked out of the pocket and down the field at the first hint of things not working out. He made up for his growing pains as a passer and our weak O-line with his feet.

That said, I think you give LT some time to develop, and give the coaching staff time to help him learn stuff that Tyrod did naturally. He’s got the advantage of experienced receivers who will make plays for him. Better he learn the art now than still be struggling next year when Coale and Boiken are gone. The D was reading LT’s eyes the whole game, which is why the passing game went no where; they knew exactly where he was going with the ball. All that commentator talk in the past years about Tyrod looking one way and then tossing another? Apparently it wasn’t just talk, and we saw the difference on Saturday.

I’m an old pre-Beamer Hokie. I know what it is to lose almost all the time; to win games only on the strength of a kicker’s foot (and now we can’t count on that, even). Every Saturday I’m pinching myself, hardly able to believe we’re on TV … again. Settle in, young Hokies. It may be a ratty year. Growth is sometimes not pretty to watch. GIve it time.

by ailinsh on Oct 4, 2011 7:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Can we really wait??

Josh Oglesby, Eddie Whitley Cris Hill, Danny Coale, Chris Drager, Barquell Rivers, Blake DeChristopher, Jaymes Brooks, Andrew Lanier, Greg Nosal, Jarrett Boykin
and most likely Jayron Hosley and David Wilson will be gone in 7 games. It not all about developing players, quite a few of our starters are developed and are not interested in losing for the sake of gaining valuable experience. Even though LT3 may be a better QB next year, VT will have a young offensive line, a very young stable of RB’s, little depth at wide receiver and a very young secondary. Even though I am not worried about Bud’s defense next year without this year’s star in Hosley the offence will not be better even though we expect LT3 to be. The O line has a chance to be decent but not a lot of depth the and a lousy recruiting class. We have played 5 games and there has been very little improvement on offence. As a matter of fact the App State game was our most consistent offensive outing. The Miami game is very important on a number of levels.

A win and we have an outside chance at another 10 win season if we win the bowl game, but loss and VT may not see another ACC title game until 2013 or beyond.

by LJCool on Oct 4, 2011 7:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Virginia Tech Hokies community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
J.T. Thompson to transfer to Charlotte
Small
Simply Amazing
Small
Cool Hokie ringtones
An_early_human_small
David Wilson goes in the FIRST ROUND to the Giants!
Avatar_small
Weaver Searching for the Next Basketball Coach
Small
Vote for EMILY on Hokie Heels Facebook page.
Small
Let's remember Emily by naming Hokie Heels after her!
Avatar_small
VT Spring Game...Who's Going?
315545_1981119458653_1563180275_31869315_5504062_n_small
Johnson Wagner shoots 79 at the Masters
Small
Fuller and Exum to start spring at CB's

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editors

Photo_3_small chicagomaroon

315545_1981119458653_1563180275_31869315_5504062_n_small Josh Parcell

Me_small VTCody

Authors

36937_1407079748247_1570020053_30963868_6279841_n_small Casey Richey

Photo_276_small Mark Trible

Small Courtney Lofgren

Meeee_small Ty Hodges

Small debbieballard