2012 Sugar Bowl: Meet Michigan
Michigan Wolverines (10-2, 6-2)
Conference: Big Ten
First Year of Football: 1879
Head Coach: Brady Hoke (Ball State '82)
Offensive Coordinator: Al Borges (Cal State-Chico '81)
Defensive Coordinator: Greg Mattison (Wisc.-La Crosse '71)
Season: Michigan started the season 6-0, including a thrilling 35-31 win over Notre Dame in Week 2. They dropped their first game Oct. 15 at Michigan State as the Spartan defense registered seven sacks, four against Denard Robinson. Their other loss came two games later at Iowa when a last-second no-call went the Hawkeyes' way. Finished the year with three consecutive wins, including their first over Ohio State since 2003.
Offense (Multiple - or Denard just kicks your ass and then has a snack): In Big Ten play, averaged 4.8 ypc (2nd) and 8.6 ypa (2nd). As an outside observer, it seemed like Michigan was dead-set on turning one of the most electric players in college football into an under-center, pro-style quarterback until the second half against Notre Dame, when Robinson was unleashed and gave us arguably the most thrilling half of football this season. Since then, he's been nearly unstoppable and while most of the attention is rightfully on him, the player that has maybe meant the most to Michigan of late is running back Fitzgerald Toussaint. If ever there were a player with a name made for having a big game in New Orleans, it's Toussaint. Since the loss to MSU, he's averaged 6.1 ypc and has five touchdowns to give Michigan yet another offensive threat. Hokie fans might remember Borges. He was Auburn's OC the last time Tech made a trip to the Sugar Bowl.
Defense (4-3): In Big Ten play opponents, averaged 3.7 ypc (3rd) and 6.7 ypa (4th). Absolutely incredible turnaround for this unit, which was D.A.L. in the Big Ten last season, giving up nearly 170 more yards per game than this year. Led by a really good defensive line that averaged 3.0 sacks and 6.0 tfl per game against Big Ten foes. The line is fairly big and very experienced as three of them rank in the top four in career starts for the Wolverines. Running the ball will be a tough chore for the Hokies and if they aren't able to do it, we'll be in big trouble.
Wolverines on the WWW: Maize N Brew is the home of Michigan sports on SBN, MGoBlog is the home of my favorite character in the sports blogosphere, Henri the Otter of Ennui.
Over/Under on the Number of Times I Accidentally Type 'Brady Hokie': 3.5
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I only caught limited glances of Robinson (a couple of drives here and there), but from what I saw he seemed similar to Tyrod, fast and maneuverable inside and out of the pocket. Anybody seen him play a lot?
LET'S GO CAPS!!!
View from the enemy
Denard has very fast top speed (4.3 40), but that’s not what makes him so dangerous. He has some of the fastest acceleration I’ve ever seen, if a gap is open for half a second within 5 feet of him, he’s gone through it before it can close, and that’s what makes him so dangerous on the ground. Near the middle of the season, he seemed a lot less inclined to tuck and run than last year, which had us a bit worried, especially coupled with some horrible reads and throws. However, he’s dramatically improved over the last few games, turning in phenomenal games against Illinois, Nebraska, and OSU (which, even considering the second half of Notre Dame, is in my opinion his best performance so far this year, and best passing performance ever). In addition, as the announcers mention in his first collegiate snap, broken plays are Denard’s time to shine (here he turns what should be a 3rd and 15 into a 3rd and 1).If OSU wasn’t a fluke and he really has come that far along as a passer, you guys should watch out, because I don’t think there’s a team in the country that could stop him when he’s playing like that. Still a pretty big if, but his improvement over the latter half of the season seems to indicate that Borges is really getting through to him as a passer, and he seems to be feeling a lot more comfortable in the new offense (I’m guessing the emergence of Toussaint has something to do with that).
I can’t say enough about Toussaint either, one of the smartest runners I have ever seen. He sees creases on the field that I don’t see watching top down on TV, and is really good about waiting for his blockers to open something up for him (here’s a good example of him just waiting for blocks and working his way through traffic). Our running backs coach is hilariously prone to hyperbole, and in the past was quoted describing Toussaint as “Mike Hart but fast”, but now that he’s healthy and getting some action, you can really see the comparison. He has the same ability to come to a complete stop and cut that Mike Hart did, as well as a knack for yards after contact and ball security, and he is significantly faster (and bigger!) than the notoriously slow Hart (here’s an example of his cutting ability and the speed he can put on after).
On defense, the players to watch are Mike Martin, Ryan Van Bergen, and Jordan Kovacs. Martin is a very talented tackle, and can really do a good job of both shedding blocks to stop the run and getting great pressure on the QB. However, due to his play, he frequently gets double or triple teamed. Thankfully, that’s where RVB comes in. Not quite at Martin’s level, but he definitely takes advantage of the attention that Olines give to Martin to make some great plays on his own. Kovacs, on the other hand is our most reliable tackler, with a real knack for getting the ball, both on jumped routes and popping out fumbles. One more player to watch is our RS Freshman LB Jake Ryan. He’s capable of making some great plays (like this one), but is really prone to losing contain.
Finally, our OC is very bipolar. Sometimes he calls amazing games (Illinois, Nebraska, OSU), and other times you wonder what the hell he’s thinking (running the ball 12 times, throwing 45 in 40+mph winds at MSU, the whole Iowa game). If you see an inordinate amount of our ‘Fritz’ package (Devin Gardner at QB with Denard at wideout/tailback) be excited, because we run one, maybe two good plays from this (throwback screen and jet sweep to Denard, also potentially the halfback pass by Vincent Smith, but that’s only been used once, and against Minnesota, so I question it’s validity), but we’ll get maybe one decent play out of it for every 10 horrible ones, and Borges likes to call it at the worst possible times to stall drives and mess with Denard’s rhythm. When it works it works, but that is very rarely.
Games/highlights to watch to see our offense in top form: Illinois, Nebraska, OSU, second half of ND
Game/highlights to watch to see our defense in top form: Minnesota*, Purdue*, Illinois, Nebraska
*Take these with a grain of salt because their offenses are pretty horrible
Now hopefully that gives some background on us, but I don’t know too much about you guys either. What VT games would you guys recommend I check out to get a good idea of what we’re up against?
by Shaqsquatch on Dec 6, 2011 11:18 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The two Clemson games, the UNC game and the UVa game will give you an idea of how we play against 4-3 Ds with decent size. The Miami, UNC and UVa games will show how we fare against pro style/multiple Os. We haven’t faced a true dual threat QB this year.
A bullhorn, a bottle of whiskey and a dream. Gobbler Country | Twitter | Facebook
by furrer4heisman on Dec 6, 2011 11:26 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
For one reason or another, I have watched a lot of Michigan games.
Get ready Hokies, Robinson is the real deal. He doesn’t remind me of Tyrod, he reminds me of Armanti Edwards. In fact, on the field, you can barely tell them apart. Don’t buy into the ESPN mess about speed in the south compared to the Big 10. There is no miracle root juice that makes our guys faster than the ones Michigan has. That dude is super fast, and he hits the seam super, super fast. What we need to be concerned about besides the obvious (Robinson), is Michigan’s size. Those guys are monsters on both sides of the ball up front. This team plays a very different type of football from any other team we have seen in a while. This is a well coached, disciplined, and explosive football team. Should make for a great game, but we must be able to run the ball to keep the defense off the field. If not, we will not be happy with the result.
Should point out...
Denard is from Florida, along with scatback Vincent Smith and slot receivers Martavious Odoms and Jeremy Gallon. Also from Florida: the cover guy in our two-man WLB platoon. I agree about the root juice myth in general (Toussaint is from Ohio) but if you’re looking for proof that Big Ten boys are slower than the tiny smurfs on jetskates who develop a ludicrous speed gear chasing rabbits in the muck of Pahokee and Apopka, well, we’re probably a bad example for you because our fastest guys are all tiny Floridian smurfs on jetskates who developed a ludicrous speed gear chasing rabbits in the muck of Pahokee or Apopka.
-Seth from MGoBlog.
www.mgoblog.com
Holy cow
That hurt my brain. We do however have a tailback from Virginia who can in fact catch a rabbit.
No he was never getting heisman hype
But he has been putting up Heisman numbers since the first CLemson game, (excluding Duke and the most recent Clemson game)
I don't remember him getting Heisman hype, but
he may very well get it in the next couple of years. I think he was a victim of his own size and speed. He drew many comparisons to Cam Newton. This was wishful thinking. He is a tremendous athlete (was recruited as a tight end). Logan is still very raw, and just now speeding up his progressions. He has a long way to go, but the tools are there. We are just exited to watch him develop.
Don't know if people are still checking this thread, but...
Here’s a set of season highlights for us.

by 











