Where Virginia Tech Ranks in the Too Early 2012 Preseason Polls
Shortly after Alabama wrapped up its decimation of LSU in the BCS National Championship Game, preseason polls for 2012 started popping up around the Internet. If preseason polls in August are worthless, the ones that come out in January are even more so.
What these polls and the ones that will come out again following spring practice do give us is a glimpse at how Virginia Tech is being perceived nation-wide, as well as a check on how closely they're paying attention to who we're actually losing and retaining.
After the jump, a look at five way too early preseason polls that pretty much have the Hokies pegged the same.
Bill Connelly, SB Nation: Unranked
I like Louisville, I think Virginia Tech should always be in the Top 25, I think Kevin Sumlin has more to work with in College Station than we probably think, and Nebraska, Oklahoma State and Georgia Tech should certainly be considered here (No. 25) as well.
Andy Stapes, Sports Illustrated: No. 18
Tailback David Wilson will head to the NFL, but the Hokies always seem to have someone ready to plug into the backfield. More interesting is the passing game, which could blossom with Logan Thomas throwing to Marcus Davis (6-foot-4, 228), D.J. Coles (6-3, 224) and Dyrell Roberts (6-2, 196). Virginia Tech also brings back its entire front seven on defense, but because the Hokies play in the ACC, I refuse to get too excited until they prove they can win outside the league.
Virginia Tech will have to rebuild its offense to do it again in 2012. Quarterback Logan Thomas will be back for his second season as a starter, but the Hokies won't have record-setting tailback David Wilson, who is leaving for the NFL draft as a junior. They're also losing four starting offensive linemen and top receivers Jarrett Boykin and Danny Coale. The good news is that as many as nine starters might be back on defense -- if junior cornerback Jayron Hosley comes back.
Brett McMurphy, CBS Sports: No. 19
Last year, Virginia Tech limited eight opponents to 17 points or less and the Hokies return virtually everyone from that unit, including DEs James Gayle and J.R. Collins, LBs Tariq Edwards and Jack Tyler and CB Kyle Fuller. The Hokies also get back LBs Bruce Taylor and Jeron Gouveia-Winslow and DT Antoine Hopkins, who missed all or part of last season because of injuries. RB David Wilson's departure is a blow, but QB Logan Thomas continues to get better.
QB Logan Thomas will be the only returnee of note on offense, meaning coaches will need to do yeoman work in spring drills developing depth at tailback and wide receiver. But there will be no such concerns on defense, which could be the best in the ACC next fall. A talented front seven means it's going to be hard for foes to run on the Hokies. The secondary will have two new starters, but it still should be an OK unit.
Unranked by my own network. What a world.
The narrative that has emerged after David Wilson's decision to go to the NFL is that the national writers believe the Hokies' defense is good enough to keep them in the Top 25, but enough has been lost on offense that there will be some hiccups thanks to a more rugged schedule. I can buy that.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
think those opinions are fair
Worried about the running game without Wilson and so many new starters in the line. Passing game will be fine and D should be outstanding
by jmpecker on Jan 12, 2012 3:41 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Passing game
won’t be fine unless the OL can be rebuilt.
I like Thomas, I like the WRs, but you gotta have protection.
If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will!!
Robert Hunter
by Buck Melanoma on Jan 12, 2012 5:48 AM EST up reply actions
Running game
We always reload at RB. Ever since Kenny Oxendine, we have had good running backs. We will be OK. The defense will give us some short fields. The kicking game is my concern. Put a kicker and a punter on scholarship for Pete’s sake. I think we have an opportunity to surprise some people next year. We will be a good football team as usual.
Uh
I like the first one, Bill Connelly.. “I think Virginia Tech should always be in the Top 25”… yet, he has us unranked.
I’m fine with where we are ranked. I’m feeling pretty good about next season. If last year’s Orange Bowl was a wake-up call for the program, I think the way the Sugar Bowl fizzled this year might have been a necessary “snap out of it” moment for HCFB.
I think we’ll be good next year. I think the defense will be stellar – and the schedule is set up where we won’t have to hear people bitch and moan about “Tech doesn’t play anybody”..
If there will ever be a year...
For the return of Beamerball, this would be it. The D is going to have to win some games for us before the offense finally readjusts.
Need some plays from Special Teams
Correct me if I’m wrong, but it seemed like VT had ZERO returns for TDs on ST and D. Well, I think there were some against App State, but against FBS teams, did they score on a return? I can’t remember a single one. That is shameful. Beamerball needs a makeover.
VT needs a punter, FG kicker, kick off specialist, a RETURNER, and ANYONE to block some kicks. (They may need a new Special Teams coach too.)
by Chazz Michael Michaelzz on Jan 12, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
Love the FSU, UMich & WVU Hype
FSU is ranked anywhere from 5 to 17. Expect that number to rise as the EJ Manuel praise intensifies over the off season. FSU hype will never die.
UMich is solidly ranked from 8-11. That’s nice, but I didn’t see a top 10 team when I was in NOLA. Some key losses on that D-line and their LBs are mediocre. Hmm… I guess we’ll see.
And WVU was the real winner. Ranked 7-13. They went from unranked in week 13 to a top 10 team? They better hope they beat Syracuse next year.
by Chazz Michael Michaelzz on Jan 12, 2012 1:14 PM EST reply actions
Michigan in 2012..
Michigan is going to get embarrassed by Alabama to kick-off next season. If our young, patch-work defense could shut them down in the Sugar Bowl could you imagine what Alabama will do to them?
Really hard to predict next season
I despise preseason rankings. They really are pointless and primarily rooted in pure guess work without much reliable data. Just a media construction to generate attention and stir up debate.
Having said that, I think I usually have a decent feel for how good we will be. But this year I am clueless. I don’t know what to expect now that Wilson is gone. I don’t have any clue how good our O line replacements can be expected to be or whether they will gel quickly. If we don’t have a really fast learner who impresses as a runner AND the O line is not very good, we easily could have a snowball effect and be terrible season.
On the other hand, if the O-line plays well and we have someone who can step up and run reasonably well, we could be awesome in the passing game. Our D should be excellent. If we can protect up front and get the passing game going, we could be very capable on offense. I have to imagine that Frank will be spending more quality time with special teams after what we saw this season. Maybe we will see a renewal of the pride a joy team next season.
Lot of questions but not necessarily bad answers coming.
I don't understand Staples
You guys beat a pretty stout Neb. team just a couple of years ago. And its not like other teams play more than 1 or 2 quality non-conf. teams any given season.
Google's homepage celebrates too much shit.

by 













